When You Are Number Two
CHICAGO - Jul 20/10 - SNS -- Following is the energy futures comment from PFGBEST Research.
By Phil Flynn
The Energy Report for Tuesday, July 20, 2010
When you are number two, aren't you supposed to try harder? China reached a major milestone in its history when it was reported by the International Energy Agency that China had over taken the United States of America as the world's largest energy consumer. This of course is a label that has belonged to us for a very long time and despite what some environmental naysayers would say, it is a label that we should have worn with pride. For years we heard people scold us because the United States consumes 25% of the world's energy yet has only 5% of the world's population. Some looked at our consumption as piggish and that somehow we were bad. Yet what those naysayers failed to realize was that consumption helped drive global economic wealth around the globe. The truth is that our leadership in energy consumption reflected our leadership as a global economic growth engine that fed the world. Not only that, the US was energy efficient in getting better GDP per barrel back on investment than almost anywhere else around the globe. The US was not consuming too much, the problem was that other countries were consuming and producing too little. Countries like China that has about 60% of the world population, yet despite that was a distant runner-up in the energy consumption crown. Back in 2000 China consumed only half of what the US did at that time. The reason of course was that China's economy, driven by years of communist and socialistic controlled markets, failed to produce the type of economic growth that could support the country with the world's biggest population and the type of demand growth you would expect in a country in the modern world. China lacked infrastructure and the industrial output that would create wealth that could support that type of demand. Chinese citizens a decade or so ago had more bikes than cars and millions in the country did not even have electricity and still don't have electricity to this day. Now China has assumed its rightful place as the world's top energy producer after decades of playing catch up and decades now of a strong upward growth trend. Still despite this noble achievement, shouldn't they be consuming even more? The IEA says that China consumed the equivalent of 2,252 million tons of oil last year. That according to the IEA is roughly 4% more than the U.S. used. The U.S. demand oil equivalent which measures oil, nuclear, coal, natural gas and renewables showed US demand at 2,170 million tons. Despite this great honor and the billions of dollars in economic stimulus that it took to achieve this China says it is not so. China says that the International Energy Agency data is unreliable. The International Business Times reported that, "in February, China's National Bureau of Statistics had put the total energy consumption in the country at 2.132 billion tons of oil equivalent. Both the agencies deploy different techniques to calculate the energy consumption leading to variations in the assessments, said a NEA official, according to the China Daily. Commenting that the IEA report ignored China's measures to reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions, Zhou Xian highlighted the country's contribution to carbon-free energy generation. He said China has surpassed the US in generating clean energy from various sources such as hydropower, solar power, nuclear power and wind power.' Well obviously China has liked that number two energy position because it likes to be the underdog when it comes to carbon reduction talks. China is still far less efficient when using energy. The U.S. uses more oil per ton per person because our population is much less than China's. The Wall street Journal says that the U.S. used 7.1 tons of oil per person and in China they used 1.7. Of course in China they have millions that hardly use any. Many feared that when China became the world's leader in energy consumption the world would have hit peak oil. There were those who estimated that oil prices would be $200.00 a barrel or more. Yet instead we find ourselves with an oil glut. In fact the only thing that moved the oil market yesterday seemed to be stock market optimism or pessimism and the threat of storms in the Gulf. Now one tropical wave is gone but another has seen the odds of it becoming a hurricane increase from 20% to 30%. Still the odds are not high enough to keep the markets focus off of the stock market and to lesser extent the euro. The euro has shown some good strength and technically looks like it wants to move higher. Still as we have been saying oil has been in a range so make sure you respect that. Make sure that you call to get on my daily energy blast and to sign up for my daily buy and sell points on all of the major commodities markets. Just call me at 800-935-6487 or email me at pflynn@pfgbest.com to open your account and check out the best in business news on the Fox Business Network where you can see me every day!
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading futures and options.Past performance is not indicative of future results. The information and data in this report were obtained from sources considered reliable. Their accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed and the giving of the same is not to be deemed as an offer or solicitation on our part with respect to the sale or purchase of any securities or commodities. PFGBEST, its officers and directors may in the normal course of business have positions, which may or may not agree with the opinions expressed in this report. Any decision to purchase or sell as a result of the opinions expressed in this report will be the full responsibility of the person authorizing such transaction.
PFGBEST Research Team
Phone: 800-361-6855 or 319-553-2181
DISCLAIMER: Futures and options trading involve substantial risk. The valuation of futures and options may fluctuate, and as a result, clients may lose more then their original investment. In
no event should the content of this website be construed as an express of an implied promise, guarantee or implication by of from the author(s) that you will profit or that losses can or will be
limited in any manner whatsoever. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Information provided on this website is intended solely for informative purposes and is obtained
from sources believed to be reliable. Information is in no way guaranteed. No guarantee of any kind is implied or possible where projections of future conditions are attempted. PFGBEST Research. its officers, directors, employees and brokers may in the normal course of business have positions, which may or may not agree with the opinions expressed in
this report.
Information on this page is derived from third parties and is deemed to be reliable. STAT Communications Ltd. accepts no responsibility for errors, omissions or inaccuracies in any of the material
presented on this web site. Opinions expressed on this web site are those of the respective individuals and/or institutions and do not represent the opinions of STAT Communications Ltd. and/or STAT
Publishing or its staff and/or management.