Market Intelligence
for the World's
Agriculture Industry
Since 1988
 STAT Specialty Crop News - Covering the world since 1988!
Subscribe Now!
For full site access

Lost Password?
Customer Center

Trade Directory

Special Crops
Beans
Lentils
Peas
Chickpeas
Birdseed
Mustard & Other
Spices & Herbs
Dried Fruit & Nuts
Supply-Demand

The rest of Agriculture
Bio-Energy
Commentary
Grain
Oilseed
Livestock
Poultry
Cotton & Wool
Fresh Fruit & Vegetables
Dried Fruit & Nuts
Dairy
Technology
General
Organic
Just for Growers

Cash Markets
Futures Markets
Weather
Price Graphs
Export Data
Supply-Demand



Subscribe Today!
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Agreement

Ag Links
Affiliates
Add Headlines!
To your website!


Infield Feeding Fertilizers Land

EDMONTON - Nov 17/08 - SNS -- Feeding livestock in fields over the winter instead of in corrals greatly benefits the land, according to research by the University of Saskatchewan.

"Stored feeds such as alfalfa hay, grass hay or cereal silage contain significant concentrations of nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium," says Gordon Hutton, development officer, Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development, Airdrie. "Cattle retain only a small portion of the nutrients found in stored feeds. The vast majority of the feed nutrients are excreted in the urine or the dung. Feed nutrients also accumulate on winter feeding sites through feed waste."

In more traditional corral feeding systems nutrients accumulate in the bedding pack. With in-field feeding, excreted nutrients and feed waste accumulate in the field.

"Nitrogen especially benefits from in-field feeding," says Hutton. "A winter feeding project at the University of Saskatchewan resulted in 30% to 40% of the feed nitrogen being recovered after in-field feeding on a grass pasture versus only 1% after corral manure was applied to the pasture. The higher nitrogen capture with in-field feeding is due in part to the reduction in nitrogen losses from off-gassing that occurs within corral feeding systems."

Bale grazing, bale processing or portable bunk feeders are examples of commonly used in-field feeding systems.

The distribution of nutrients from urine, dung or feed waste in the field will vary with the size of the feeding area, quantity of feed delivered, length of feeding period and feed type. Legume based feeds generally provide the highest nutrient concentrations.

Winter feeding on old grass pastures may be one of the most promising options. Most older pastures are low in soil fertility and, as result, low in forage productivity. With winter feeding, high amounts of plant available nutrients can be introduced to the pasture and recycled through new forage growth over the next few growing seasons.

"However, there are limitations to in-field feeding," says Hutton. "One of the challenges is managing nutrient placement. Regular rotation of feeding sites, bedding areas and water sources will improve urine, dung and feed waste distribution."

"As we enter this years winter feeding period it may be worth while to reassess how we handle the nutrients in stored feed supplies," adds Hutton. "With the rising costs of commercial fertilizers, stored feed nutrients may have an increasing value for use as not only a livestock nutrient but also as source of crop fertility."


Subcribers get complete access to all articles and special sections on the STATpub website.

To subscribe just click on Subscribe Now!


Add AgMarket News headlines
to your site



Use of Information

Copyright © 1988-2012 STAT Communications Ltd., Canada. All Rights Reserved. This information may not be republished in part of in full in any form whatsoever without the prior written consent of STAT Communications Ltd. The article on this page may not be harvested and reprinted on any website. However, we encourage links back to this or any other public article on our website.



Disclaimer

The information in this article is provided without any warranty of any kind whatsoever. By accessing this service, you agree that STAT Communications Ltd. will not be liable for any expenses, losses or costs that may be incurred by the interpretation and use of the information in this website, nor as a result of the information on this site being inaccurate or incomplete in any way.



Click here to set STATpub.com as your browser's home page!
Copyright © 2012 STAT Communications Ltd., Canada.All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions
Send us your comments.
Privacy Policy
Links Directory