for the World's Agriculture Industry Since 1988 |
![]() | ||
For full site access Lost Password? Customer Center Trade Directory Special Crops Beans Lentils Peas Chickpeas Birdseed Mustard & Other Spices & Herbs Dried Fruit & Nuts Supply-Demand The rest of Agriculture Bio-Energy Commentary Grain Oilseed Livestock Poultry Cotton & Wool Fresh Fruit & Vegetables Dried Fruit & Nuts Dairy Technology General Organic Just for Growers Cash Markets Futures Markets Weather Price Graphs Export Data Supply-Demand Subscribe Today! Privacy Policy Subscriber Agreement Ag Links Affiliates Add Headlines! To your website! |
Grimes and Plain Weekly Cattle OutlookCHICAGO - May 2/08 - SNS -- Following is a week ending cattle market comment from the University of Missouri - Columbia's Glenn Grimes and Ron Plain. Cow slaughter for 2008 through the week ending April 12 has been up 3.7 percent, dairy cow slaughter up 0.3 percent and beef cow slaughter was up 6.7 percent. For the year through April 12, cow slaughter in 2008 was up 19.4 percent from 2006. Dairy cow slaughter for this two-year period was up 15.4 percent and beef cow slaughter was up 23 percent. For the four-week period ending April 12, 2008, total cow slaughter was up 3.5 percent from 2007. Dairy cow slaughter for these four weeks was down 2.9 percent and beef cow slaughter was up 10.3 percent. The odds appear to be high that U.S. beef cow-calf producers are reducing the cow herd size but probably not at a rapid rate. Demand for beef at the consumer level for January-March of 2008 was down 3.0 percent from a year earlier. Pork demand at the consumer level for these three months was up 0.2 percent, broiler demand was up 3.2 percent and turkey demand was up 7.7 percent. Live fed cattle demand for the first three months of this year was up 0.2 percent and live hog demand growth for the period was a sizzling 8.0 percent. The live animal demand showing growth with consumer beef and pork demand down or only about the same as a year earlier is due to larger exports and smaller imports. With the high costs for energy, the odds appear quite high for the demand for pork and beef at the consumer level to be under strong downward pressure as go on through 2008 even with the strong efforts of the beef and pork industries to promote their product. Compared to last week feeder cattle and calves were $1-3 per cwt higher, with instances of $5.00 higher on 700-800-pound heifers at Oklahoma City. The range in prices for medium and large frame Number One steers were: 400-500 pounds $117-129 per cwt, 500-600 pounds $116-125 per cwt, 600-700 pounds $108-118 per cwt, 700-800 pounds $104.75-111 per cwt and 800-1,000 pounds $91-106 per cwt. Wholesale Choice beef at $154.49 per cwt down $0.20 per cwt Friday morning compared to a week earlier. Select beef at $153.02 per cwt up $1.65 per cwt from seven days earlier. Fed live cattle weighted average price for the five-market area at $92.02 per cwt down $0.09 per cwt through Thursday compared to the same period last week. Weighted average carcass prices for the five-market area at $147 per cwt down $2.00 per cwt from seven days earlier through Thursday. Slaughter this week under Federal Inspection was estimated at 699 thousand head, up 5.4 percent from a year earlier. Issued by Glenn Grimes and Ron Plain University of Missouri - Columbia DISCLAIMER: Futures and options trading involve substantial risk. The valuation of futures and options may fluctuate, and as a result, clients may lose more then their original investment. In no event should the content of this website be construed as an express of an implied promise, guarantee or implication by of from the author(s) that you will profit or that losses can or will be limited in any manner whatsoever. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Information provided on this website is intended solely for informative purposes and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Information is in no way guaranteed. No guarantee of any kind is implied or possible where projections of future conditions are attempted. Information on this page is derived from third parties and is deemed to be reliable. STAT Communications Ltd. accepts no responsibility for errors, omissions or inaccuracies in any of the material presented on this web site. Opinions expressed on this web site are those of the respective individuals and/or institutions and do not represent the opinions of STAT Communications Ltd. and/or STAT Publishing or its staff and/or management.
|