for the World's Agriculture Industry Since 1988 |
![]() | ||
For full site access Lost Password? Customer Center Trade Directory Special Crops Beans Lentils Peas Chickpeas Birdseed Mustard & Other Spices & Herbs Dried Fruit & Nuts Supply-Demand The rest of Agriculture Bio-Energy Commentary Grain Oilseed Livestock Poultry Cotton & Wool Fresh Fruit & Vegetables Dried Fruit & Nuts Dairy Technology General Organic Just for Growers Cash Markets Futures Markets Weather Price Graphs Export Data Supply-Demand Subscribe Today! Privacy Policy Subscriber Agreement Ag Links Affiliates Add Headlines! To your website! |
Grimes and Plain Weekly Cattle OutlookCHICAGO - Jan 4/08 - SNS -- Following is a week ending cattle market comment from the University of Missouri - Columbia's Glenn Grimes and Ron Plain. The 2007 broad-based energy bill has the potential to impact farm markets and crop production decisions for years to come. Congress' ultimate goal is for the nation to use 36 billion gallons of renewable fuels by the year 2022. According to plans in the bill, corn-based ethanol production will peak at 15 billion gallons per year in 2015 and stay at that level. This will mean roughly doubling the current corn-based production capacity. Building that much more corn-based production facilities is not the most challenging aspect of reaching the goal. It will be producing enough corn to keep these plants supplied without shortchanging other corn users such as the cattle industry and supplying acres to other crops. In fact, the current mid-$4.00 per bushel corn futures price is not due to the current supply of corn based on 2007-2008 marketing year needs, but the battle for acres with soybeans for the 2008 crop year. The cost of producing cattle will be impacted by the energy bill for years to come. Feeder cattle prices will be substantially lower with a given Fed cattle price than past history suggests. Ways of producing more beef from forages will be a part of the management strategy by cattle producers. Cattle producers continue to cull the cow herd more than a year earlier. For the year through the week ending December 15, cow slaughter was up 6.2 percent from 12 months earlier. Cow slaughter for the year of 2007 through the week ending December 15 was up 17.8 percent from 2005. The large cow slaughter continues to be fueled by the drought that shortened ranges and pastures and contributed to high hay prices. The odds appear quite high for a relatively small reduction in the cow herd for January 1, 2008, compared to a year earlier. Wholesale beef prices Friday morning with Choice beef at $148.50 per cwt was down $0.12 per cwt from seven days earlier. Select beef at $137.17 per cwt was up $1.17 per cwt from a week earlier. The weighted average live fed cattle price for the five-market area through Thursday at $94.58 per cwt was up $2.63 per cwt from seven days earlier. The weighted average negotiated carcass price through Thursday at $150.75 per cwt was up $4.35 per cwt from a week earlier. The Oklahoma City feeder cattle auction was closed again this week for the New Year's Day holiday. Slaughter this week under Federal Inspection was estimated at 528 thousand head, up 0.6 percent from a year earlier. Issued by Glenn Grimes and Ron Plain University of Missouri - Columbia DISCLAIMER: Futures and options trading involve substantial risk. The valuation of futures and options may fluctuate, and as a result, clients may lose more then their original investment. In no event should the content of this website be construed as an express of an implied promise, guarantee or implication by of from the author(s) that you will profit or that losses can or will be limited in any manner whatsoever. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Information provided on this website is intended solely for informative purposes and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Information is in no way guaranteed. No guarantee of any kind is implied or possible where projections of future conditions are attempted. Information on this page is derived from third parties and is deemed to be reliable. STAT Communications Ltd. accepts no responsibility for errors, omissions or inaccuracies in any of the material presented on this web site. Opinions expressed on this web site are those of the respective individuals and/or institutions and do not represent the opinions of STAT Communications Ltd. and/or STAT Publishing or its staff and/or management.
|