Market Intelligence
for the World's
Agriculture Industry
Since 1988
 STAT Specialty Crop News - Covering the world since 1988!
Subscribe Now!
For full site access

Lost Password?
Customer Center

Trade Directory

Special Crops
Beans
Lentils
Peas
Chickpeas
Birdseed
Mustard & Other
Spices & Herbs
Dried Fruit & Nuts
Supply-Demand

The rest of Agriculture
Bio-Energy
Commentary
Grain
Oilseed
Livestock
Poultry
Cotton & Wool
Fresh Fruit & Vegetables
Dried Fruit & Nuts
Dairy
Technology
General
Organic
Just for Growers

Cash Markets
Futures Markets
Weather
Price Graphs
Export Data
Supply-Demand



Subscribe Today!
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Agreement

Ag Links
Affiliates
Add Headlines!
To your website!


Rewriting U.S. Edible Bean History

VANCOUVER - Dec 13/07 - SNS -- Dry edible bean production in the United States has been smaller than thought in recent years, judging from grower level data compiled by the USDA's Farm Service Agency, which administers farm support programs in that country.

Total dry edible bean production in the United States is closer to 1.04 million metric tons (MT) than the 1.144 million reported in the USDA's latest crop production estimates; while seeded area is closer to 1.384 million acres, than the 1.526 million reported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). These revised estimates are based on NASS yield data and FSA seeded area data.

In all states except California, any grower who wants to obtain farm support payments for any program or federally insured crop must declare whether and what crops were sown to each individual acre of land under their control each year. Farmers also report acreage they were unable to seed as intended and acreage on which crops failed. Because the information is used as the basis for a variety program payments, lying about what was planted constitutes fraud and incurs severe penalties. This has been more true since the current incarnation of the U.S. Farm Bill came into effect in 2002 than previously.

Growers believe current civil and future political penalties for lying to the FSA are too severe to misrepresent what was sown on each field on their farm. This stands in stark contrast to the attitude some have about data given to the NASS. Penalties are seen as administrative. Consequently, they do not seem as concerned about lying.

It needs to be stressed each agency performs a different function and collects different data from farmers. This reflects the fact that agencies have very different missions within the USDA. The NASS predicts the future, whereas the FSA administers the present. However, despite the high degree of specificity in FSA data, it does not appear to be used by the NASS to "correct" historical information and refine the foundation for future predictions.


Subscribers can read the full text of the article by Clicking here


Subcribers get complete access to all articles and special sections on the STATpub website.

To subscribe just click on Subscribe Now!


Add AgMarket News headlines
to your site



Use of Information

Copyright © 1988-2008 STAT Communications Ltd., Canada. All Rights Reserved. This information may not be republished in part of in full in any form whatsoever without the prior written consent of STAT Communications Ltd. The article on this page may not be harvested and reprinted on any website. However, we encourage links back to this or any other public article on our website.



Disclaimer

The information in this article is provided without any warranty of any kind whatsoever. By accessing this service, you agree that STAT Communications Ltd. will not be liable for any expenses, losses or costs that may be incurred by the interpretation and use of the information in this website, nor as a result of the information on this site being inaccurate or incomplete in any way.



Click here to set STATpub.com as your browser's home page!
Copyright © 2008 STAT Communications Ltd., Canada.All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions
Send us your comments.
Privacy Policy
Links Directory