for the World's Agriculture Industry Since 1988 |
![]() | ||
For full site access Lost Password? Customer Center Trade Directory Special Crops Beans Lentils Peas Chickpeas Birdseed Mustard & Other Spices & Herbs Dried Fruit & Nuts Supply-Demand The rest of Agriculture Bio-Energy Commentary Grain Oilseed Livestock Poultry Cotton & Wool Fresh Fruit & Vegetables Dried Fruit & Nuts Dairy Technology General Organic Just for Growers Cash Markets Futures Markets Weather Price Graphs Export Data Supply-Demand Subscribe Today! Privacy Policy Subscriber Agreement Ag Links Affiliates Add Headlines! To your website! |
Grimes and Plain Weekly Cattle OutlookCHICAGO - Jan 19/07 - SNS -- Following is a week ending cattle market comment from the University of Missouri - Columbia's Glenn Grimes and Ron Plain. The USDA final estimate for the 2006 corn crop was not good news for the cattle industry. On Friday January 12, USDA released the January estimate of the 2006 corn crop and reduced the crop from 10.745 billion bushels to 10.535 billion bushels. The market responded with a limit up or near limit up for all corn future prices. USDA increased the 2006-2007 marketing crop year price by $0.10 per bushel to an average price of $3.20 per bushel. For the period of 1908-1942 corn prices averaged $0.78 per bushel, for 1942-1972 the average corn price was $1.26 per bushel and from 1973-2005 the average corn price was $2.37 per bushel. The probabilities appear high for another step up in prices for several years. If corn prices increase in future years by the percentage of the average of the two previous step ups we will have corn prices above $4.00 per bushel for the next period. In the 70's, when we had the last major move up in corn prices prior to the indicated current move, meat consumption declined for 3-4 years, then leveled off for 8-9 years, then started climbing again. USDA also reduced the 2006 soybean crop by 16 million bushels. These higher corn prices will continue to exert downward pressure on feeder cattle prices. Because of the winter storm last weekend Oklahoma City did not hold a feeder cattle sale this week. Remember for each $0.10 per bushel increase in corn prices 400-pound feeder cattle prices will be influenced negatively by about $1.00 per cwt. For 600-pound feeders the decline in price per cwt will amount to about $0.75 with all other costs held constant. Fed cattle trade was slow to develop again this week with only 38,135 thousand head in the negotiated trade through Thursday. The weighted average live prices for fed cattle in the negotiated trade for the five-market area at $86.97 per cwt was down $0.53 per cwt from a week earlier. The negotiated carcass trade for the five-market area showed the price down $0.85 per cwt at $139.80 per cwt. Wholesale beef prices Friday morning had Choice beef at $153.10 per cwt, down $1.70 per cwt from a week earlier. Select beef at $141.18 per cwt was up $1.12 per cwt from 7 days earlier. Cattle slaughter this week under Federal Inspection was estimated at 613 thousand head, up 1.3% from a year earlier. Issued by Glenn Grimes and Ron Plain University of Missouri - Columbia DISCLAIMER: Futures and options trading involve substantial risk. The valuation of futures and options may fluctuate, and as a result, clients may lose more then their original investment. In no event should the content of this website be construed as an express of an implied promise, guarantee or implication by of from the author(s) that you will profit or that losses can or will be limited in any manner whatsoever. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Information provided on this website is intended solely for informative purposes and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Information is in no way guaranteed. No guarantee of any kind is implied or possible where projections of future conditions are attempted. Information on this page is derived from third parties and is deemed to be reliable. STAT Communications Ltd. accepts no responsibility for errors, omissions or inaccuracies in any of the material presented on this web site. Opinions expressed on this web site are those of the respective individuals and/or institutions and do not represent the opinions of STAT Communications Ltd. or its management.
|