Market Intelligence
for the World's
Agriculture Industry
Since 1988
 STAT Specialty Crop News - Covering the world since 1988!
Subscribe Now!
For full site access

Lost Password?
Customer Center

Trade Directory

Special Crops
Beans
Lentils
Peas
Chickpeas
Birdseed
Mustard & Other
Spices & Herbs
Dried Fruit & Nuts
Supply-Demand

The rest of Agriculture
Bio-Energy
Commentary
Grain
Oilseed
Livestock
Poultry
Cotton & Wool
Fresh Fruit & Vegetables
Dried Fruit & Nuts
Dairy
Technology
General
Organic
Just for Growers

Cash Markets
Futures Markets
Weather
Price Graphs
Export Data
Supply-Demand



Subscribe Today!
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Agreement

Ag Links
Affiliates
Add Headlines!
To your website!


Farm Chemical Hazards Exposure Risks Rise Over Season

REGINA - Jun 27/05 - SNS -- Annual cereals produce more dry matter per acre when harvested at the soft dough stage, according to the Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food.

"There is more dry matter yield per acre in waiting to the soft dough stage before cutting. For years, we didn't know the answer. We assumed it amounted to more or less the same yield," Rangeland and Forage Agrologist Lorne Klein says.

In the summer of 2003, simulated grazing forage yields were collected from the Cool Season and Warm Season Annuals Forage Trial plots at Redvers and Indian Head. Annual spring cereals, which are seeded in spring, are one of the forage options available to livestock producers.

"Generally, there are two methods of harvesting a spring seeded spring cereal," explains Klein. "Either the crop can be grazed in the vegetative stage two to four times during the summer, or the crop can be allowed to develop to the milk/soft dough stage and cut once. After cutting, the windrow can be baled, chopped for silage, or left in the field for swath grazing."


Grazineg Yields Less Than Single Cut

Producers have questioned whether the cumulative dry matter yield of multiple grazing is similar to the single cut dry matter yield at the milk/soft dough stage. Saskatchewan research comparing dry matter yields of the two harvest options was not available. Research from Alberta from 1981-1983 had shown that simulated grazing yields are significantly less than single cut yields.

Research conducted in Saskatchewan in 2003 showed that simulated grazing yield of the cool season crops (oats, barley) averaged 59% of the single cut greenfeed yield. Further to that, the simulated grazing yield of the warm season crops (Golden German, Siberian Red, Strain R German, White Wonder) averaged 51% of the single cut greenfeed yield.


45% to 50% Better Yields At Soft Dough State

Tests were conducted again in 2004. Results indicated that simulated grazing of cool season crops yielded 50% of the single cut at the milk/soft dough stage, while simulated grazing of warm season crops yielded 45% of the single cut.

"We found that there was considerably less dry matter yield in the simulated multiple grazing plots, whereas on the plots where we waited an extra 35 days before harvesting the cereals, the yield far outweighed that."

Klein believes producers are going to think twice about seeding annuals to graze their cattle in the future.

Given the magnitude of the differences, producers wishing to graze annuals should consider allowing the crop to reach the greenfeed stage, and then windrow and swath graze.

Of course, harvesting costs and feed quality of simulated grazing and greenfeed need to be factored against the expected yield differences.


Subcribers get complete access to all articles and special sections on the STATpub website.

To subscribe just click on Subscribe Now!


Add AgMarket News headlines
to your site



Use of Information

Copyright © 1988-2008 STAT Communications Ltd., Canada. All Rights Reserved. This information may not be republished in part of in full in any form whatsoever without the prior written consent of STAT Communications Ltd. The article on this page may not be harvested and reprinted on any website. However, we encourage links back to this or any other public article on our website.



Disclaimer

The information in this article is provided without any warranty of any kind whatsoever. By accessing this service, you agree that STAT Communications Ltd. will not be liable for any expenses, losses or costs that may be incurred by the interpretation and use of the information in this website, nor as a result of the information on this site being inaccurate or incomplete in any way.



Click here to set STATpub.com as your browser's home page!
Copyright © 2008 STAT Communications Ltd., Canada.All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions
Send us your comments.
Privacy Policy
Links Directory