Market Intelligence
for the World's
Agriculture Industry
Since 1988
 STAT Specialty Crop News - Covering the world since 1988!
Subscribe Now!
For full site access

Lost Password?
Customer Center

Trade Directory

Special Crops
Beans
Lentils
Peas
Chickpeas
Birdseed
Mustard & Other
Spices & Herbs
Dried Fruit & Nuts
Supply-Demand

The rest of Agriculture
Bio-Energy
Commentary
Grain
Oilseed
Livestock
Poultry
Cotton & Wool
Fresh Fruit & Vegetables
Dried Fruit & Nuts
Dairy
Technology
General
Organic
Just for Growers

Cash Markets
Futures Markets
Weather
Price Graphs
Export Data
Supply-Demand



Subscribe Today!
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Agreement

Ag Links
Affiliates
Add Headlines!
To your website!


Harvest Technique Affects Alfalfa Quality

FARGO - Jun 10/05 - SNS -- The quality of alfalfa produced can be affected by the way it is harvested, cautions a North Dakota State University dairy expert says.

"Quality affects price," says J.W. Schroeder, NDSU Extension Service dairy specialist. "For those aspects over which the alfalfa growers have control, unlike weather and insects, the rapid change in quality makes timing of the harvest paramount."

Recent hay auctions report mid-May, new-crop hay from Kansas and Nebraska was selling for $125 to $130 a ton, and round bales topping the market at $82.50 per ton on a load of second-crop hay from Iowa. One load of very wet new-crop, round-baled hay sold for $50 per ton.

"There begins the debate for sellers and buyer alike," Schroeder says. "What is the trade-off for yield and feeding value?"

Researchers in Idaho, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania jointly are investigating the trade-offs between yield and quality changes over multiple cuttings. Based on the data collected, alfalfa quality appears to change faster in the first cutting than in later cuttings. First-cutting alfalfa decreases about five points of relative feed value (RFV) per day. Second-cutting alfalfa decreases two to three points per day; and third and fourth cuttings decline one to two points per day.


Earlier Harvests Yield Better Quality

This means that the earlier the stage of harvest, the higher the quality of the alfalfa hay that is available for feed or sale, according to Schroeder. Dairies want a minimum of 150 to 160 RFV, so because of the rapid decrease in value, producers should start to harvest when the RFV is 180 to 200. However, for dairy producers who raise their own hay, 150 to 160 RFV is ideal to promote dry-matter intake and maximize milk yield by keeping the diet forage-to-concentrate ratio at least 50-to-50, and preferably 60-to-40.

Relative feed value is an index that ranks cool-season legumes, such as alfalfa, and grasses by potential digestible dry-matter intake. It is calculated from digestible dry matter and dry-matter intake.

Digestible dry matter is an estimate of the feed's total digestibility and is calculated from percent of acid detergent fiber (ADF). Dry-matter intake is an estimate of the amount of feed an animal will consume in percent of body weight and is figured from percent of neutral detergent fiber (NDF).


RFV Formula

The formula for determining RFV is:

Digestible dry matter (DDM) = 88.9 – (0.779 x percent of ADF)
Dry matter intake (DMI) = 120/(percent of NDF)
RFV = (DDM x DMI)/1.29

 For example, here's how to calculate RFV for hay or haylage
with 28% ADF and 35% NDF:

DDM: 88.9 – (0.779 x 28) = 67.1
DMI: 120/35 = 3.43
RFV: (67.1 x 3.43/1.29 = 178

RFV does not include the protein percent of the alfalfa, but it is an excellent measure of alfalfa quality because it reflects the crop's digestibility and intake potential, according to Schroeder.

"Obviously, the more mature the alfalfa at harvest, the higher the percent of ADF and NDF and lower the RFV," he says. "Rain-damaged hay also will be higher in ADF and NDF because the soluble sugars and carbohydrates can be leached out. Rain-damaged hay also is less palatable. Astute dairy farmers who purchase alfalfa not only utilize the chemical analysis and relative feed value, they also buy small quantities and feed some of it free choice to see if the cows readily consume it before purchasing larger quantities."


Dryland May Not Yield Two Crops

Dryland alfalfa growers in North Dakota often are not able to harvest more than two crops. But in states farther south, late-fall growth may change little in forage quality during mid- to late September and early October.

Research indicates that relative forage quality (RFQ), a newer measure of quality, changes about the same as RFV in the first cutting, but then declines about three points per day in the second, third and fourth cuttings.

The yield of standing alfalfa around harvest time varies considerably and increases up to 200 pounds per acre per day. Schroeder says that based on data from a number of studies, producers probably can plan on a yield increase of about 100 pounds per acre per day near harvest if growing conditions are average. This yield change is consistent across cuttings, except in late fall.

The daily yield increase will be lower in cool, cloudy weather, and if insects or diseases affect the crop, or drought occurs. It may be greater than 100 pounds per acre per day in periods of good moisture, sunshine and 75- to 85-degree weather.


Subcribers get complete access to all articles and special sections on the STATpub website.

To subscribe just click on Subscribe Now!


Add AgMarket News headlines
to your site



Use of Information

Copyright © 1988-2008 STAT Communications Ltd., Canada. All Rights Reserved. This information may not be republished in part of in full in any form whatsoever without the prior written consent of STAT Communications Ltd. The article on this page may not be harvested and reprinted on any website. However, we encourage links back to this or any other public article on our website.



Disclaimer

The information in this article is provided without any warranty of any kind whatsoever. By accessing this service, you agree that STAT Communications Ltd. will not be liable for any expenses, losses or costs that may be incurred by the interpretation and use of the information in this website, nor as a result of the information on this site being inaccurate or incomplete in any way.



Click here to set STATpub.com as your browser's home page!
Copyright © 2008 STAT Communications Ltd., Canada.All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions
Send us your comments.
Privacy Policy
Links Directory