Market Intelligence
for the World's
Agriculture Industry
Since 1988
 STAT Specialty Crop News - Covering the world since 1988!
Subscribe Now!
For full site access

Lost Password?
Customer Center

Trade Directory

Special Crops
Beans
Lentils
Peas
Chickpeas
Birdseed
Mustard & Other
Spices & Herbs
Dried Fruit & Nuts
Supply-Demand

The rest of Agriculture
Bio-Energy
Commentary
Grain
Oilseed
Livestock
Poultry
Cotton & Wool
Fresh Fruit & Vegetables
Dried Fruit & Nuts
Dairy
Technology
General
Organic
Just for Growers

Cash Markets
Futures Markets
Weather
Price Graphs
Export Data
Supply-Demand



Subscribe Today!
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Agreement

Ag Links
Affiliates
Add Headlines!
To your website!


Dow Wins Bt Patent Lawsuit

NEW YORK - Dec 15/04 - SNS -- Dow AgroSciences LLC won a patent infringement lawsuit brought by Syngenta Seeds, which targeted three insect-protected corn products that include the insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), sold by Dow AgroSciences and Monsanto Company.

Earlier in the trial proceedings, two related patents owned by Syngenta were eliminated from the case by a ruling of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware that Dow AgroSciences' and Monsanto's products did not infringe those patents, as a matter of law. The products at issue include Dow AgroSciences' Herculex I Insect Protection corn and YieldGard, a Bt corn product designed by Monsanto Company. A third Dow AgroSciences Bt corn product, still in development, was also involved.

Together, the two recent rulings deny all of Syngenta's claims against Dow AgroSciences' and Monsanto's products based on these patents.

On Thursday, December 9, Chief Judge Sue L. Robinson ruled that two of the three Syngenta patents (numbers 6,320,100; and 6,075,185) were not infringed by any product in the lawsuit as a matter of law. The two patents involved technology for more efficient expression of Bt insecticidal proteins in corn.

On Tuesday, December 14, the jury in the case found that the remaining Syngenta patent (6,403,865) is invalid and unenforceable because the subject matter of the patent was not actually invented by Syngenta. Separately, the jury found that the patents were invalid due to obviousness, considering earlier work in the field by others -- including both Dow AgroSciences' affiliated company, Mycogen Corporation, and Monsanto.


Subcribers get complete access to all articles and special sections on the STATpub website.

To subscribe just click on Subscribe Now!


Add AgMarket News headlines
to your site



Use of Information

Copyright © 1988-2008 STAT Communications Ltd., Canada. All Rights Reserved. This information may not be republished in part of in full in any form whatsoever without the prior written consent of STAT Communications Ltd. The article on this page may not be harvested and reprinted on any website. However, we encourage links back to this or any other public article on our website.



Disclaimer

The information in this article is provided without any warranty of any kind whatsoever. By accessing this service, you agree that STAT Communications Ltd. will not be liable for any expenses, losses or costs that may be incurred by the interpretation and use of the information in this website, nor as a result of the information on this site being inaccurate or incomplete in any way.



Click here to set STATpub.com as your browser's home page!
Copyright © 2008 STAT Communications Ltd., Canada.All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions
Send us your comments.
Privacy Policy
Links Directory